WASHINGTON
For parents navigating the complexities of advocating for children with disabilities, the path can often feel overwhelming—emotionally taxing and financially draining.
Advocacy groups highlight that recent shifts in the Education Department may increase these hurdles.
When parents believe their child isn’t receiving adequate services or necessary support, they have several options within their school district. These include lodging complaints with the state, asserting that their child’s rights are being violated, or even pursuing legal action in either state or federal courts.
However, these processes can involve numerous hearings with officials who may lack familiarity with disability law. Legal expenses can escalate to tens of thousands of dollars. Furthermore, legal aid organizations frequently find themselves inundated with requests, leaving many families without the necessary support.
Read More: What Will Happen to Student Loans If the Department of Education Is Closed Down?
Traditionally, for families who struggle to afford legal help, filing a complaint with the Education Department has been a practical alternative. This begins with completing the Office for Civil Rights’ online form, where parents outline instances of alleged discrimination. Following this, the agency is expected to investigate, which may involve interviewing district personnel and examining policies for possible infringements.
“This process is backed by the authority of the federal government,” said Dan Stewart, managing attorney for education and employment at the National Disability Rights Network. “The complaint portal is publicly accessible, and usually, legal representation isn’t required.”
However, advocates are increasingly concerned that this avenue might soon become less available.
Under former President Trump’s administration, the Education Department underwent substantial staff reductions—about 50% of its workforce—which significantly affected the Office for Civil Rights responsible for handling discrimination complaints involving children with disabilities. This office has also been directed to prioritize cases of antisemitism. After the change in administration, over 20,000 pending cases, including those related to disabilities, were left largely unattended for weeks. Although some processing has resumed, advocates are questioning the department’s capacity to manage its workload with a reduced staff.
“The reduction in staff has severely compromised the Office for Civil Rights’ ability to conduct thorough investigations,” Stewart remarked. “It’s hard to see how they can tackle both the backlog and the influx of new complaints.”
A recent federal lawsuit has been filed, challenging the layoffs at the Office for Civil Rights and asserting that these cuts have hampered the office’s capability to effectively process and investigate complaints.
While the OCR process has faced its share of issues, reducing the investigative staff only heightens the obstacles families face when seeking support for their children, noted Nikki Carter, an advocate and one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“It leaves families feeling powerless and despondent,” Carter explained. “Cutting staff and tightening restrictions on certain cases merely intensifies the urgency and frustration.”
Education Department officials assert that these staffing reductions will not impede civil rights investigations, describing the layoffs as “strategic decisions.”
In Alabama, where Carter is located, families face significant challenges in securing legal representation.
“Many simply lack the financial means to hire an attorney,” she observed. “And often, the representation available doesn’t align with their expectations for their child’s needs.”
Even for those who can bear the financial strain, there are only a handful of attorneys proficient in disability discrimination cases. Moreover, free representation programs often operate at limited capacity.
If the backlog of cases continues to swell at the federal Office for Civil Rights, families may lose faith in the effectiveness of investigations into their complaints, Stewart cautioned. This disillusionment could lead them to seek recourse at the state level instead.
However, state and local agencies typically lack the necessary resources and expertise to handle educational disability complaints adequately, as these cases have historically been directed to the U.S. Education Department.
“They may not have the infrastructure, knowledge, or staffing to cope with an influx of cases,” Stewart explained.
In another recent federal lawsuit, Democratic attorneys general argue that the staffing cuts at the Education Department could embolden school districts to neglect complaints of discrimination or harassment.
“Students with current complaints are unlikely to see any significant resolution, as cases remain backlogged due to insufficient staff to address them,” the lawsuit claims. “Students experiencing discrimination, sexual harassment, or assault will lose a crucial means to report their situations.”
